§ The result
HeyMilo takes the total, iMocha takes more of the criteria.
HeyMilo scores 61 (D) and iMocha 56 (F) under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. iMocha leads more of the criteria than HeyMilo — 3 to 2 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which HeyMilo leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to HeyMilo. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HeyMilo 83, iMocha 44 — and at an 18% weight it carries 92% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
Vendor profile
iMocha
iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment and skills-intelligence platform that evaluates candidates and employees across technical, cognitive, coding, and soft skills for hiring and internal talent management, including AI-based coding simulators and an AI video interviewer (Tara).
§ The record
HeyMilo is filed under Screening AI, iMocha under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeyMilo | iMocha |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2023 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeyMilo 83 · iMocha 44
7.0 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeyMilo 58 · iMocha 68
2.0 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeyMilo 42 · iMocha 38
0.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeyMilo 62 · iMocha 66
0.6 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeyMilo 46 · iMocha 48
0.2 weighted points to iMocha
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +4.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeyMilo minus iMocha.
| Category | Weight | HeyMilo | iMocha | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 68 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 44 | +39 | +7.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 38 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 66 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 64 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 46 | 48 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 66 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 56 (F) | +5 | +4.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeyMilo | iMocha | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 21 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; iMocha has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo and iMocha sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains, and 26 for iMocha, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- iMocha last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next