§ The result
HeyMilo takes the total, LinkedIn Recruiter takes more of the criteria.
HeyMilo (Screening) edges LinkedIn Recruiter (Sourcing) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 61 (D) to 57 (F). LinkedIn Recruiter leads more of the criteria than HeyMilo — 4 to 2 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which HeyMilo leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to HeyMilo. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HeyMilo 83, LinkedIn Recruiter 50) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 91% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
Vendor profile
LinkedIn Recruiter
LinkedIn Recruiter is LinkedIn's enterprise sourcing and candidate-management platform, whose Hiring Assistant add-on and AI-Assisted Search use AI to turn intake notes into qualifications, source and rank candidates, evaluate applicants against recruiter-set qualifications, and draft or send outreach.
§ The record
HeyMilo is filed under Screening AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only HeyMilo is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeyMilo | LinkedIn Recruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2023 | 2002 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeyMilo 83 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50
5.9 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeyMilo 58 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67
1.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeyMilo 42 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38
0.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeyMilo 46 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50
0.5 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeyMilo 64 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66
0.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeyMilo 66 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68
0.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +3.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +3.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeyMilo minus LinkedIn Recruiter.
| Category | Weight | HeyMilo | LinkedIn Recruiter | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 67 | -9 | -1.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 50 | +33 | +5.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 38 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 62 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 66 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 46 | 50 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 68 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 57 (F) | +4 | +3.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeyMilo | LinkedIn Recruiter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 34 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo and LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 60 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next