§ The result
HeyMilo takes the total, Pinpoint takes more of the criteria.
HeyMilo (Screening) edges Pinpoint (ATS-integrated) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 61 (D) to 57 (F). Pinpoint leads more of the criteria than HeyMilo — 3 to 2 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which HeyMilo leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to HeyMilo. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HeyMilo 83, Pinpoint 42 — and at an 18% weight it carries 92% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ The record
HeyMilo is filed under Screening AI, Pinpoint under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only HeyMilo is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeyMilo | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | JE |
| Founded | 2023 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeyMilo 83 · Pinpoint 42
7.4 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeyMilo 58 · Pinpoint 72
2.8 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeyMilo 62 · Pinpoint 68
0.9 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeyMilo 46 · Pinpoint 52
0.7 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeyMilo 42 · Pinpoint 38
0.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +3.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +3.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeyMilo minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | HeyMilo | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 72 | -14 | -2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 42 | +41 | +7.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 38 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 68 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 64 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 46 | 52 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 66 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 57 (F) | +4 | +3.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeyMilo | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next