HomeCompareHeyMilo vs Saville Assessment

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HeyMilo vs Saville Assessment

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

HeyMilo leads Saville Assessment on all 7 criteria.

HeyMilo, filed under Screening, comes out 13 points above Saville Assessment, filed under Assessment: 61 (D) against 48 (F) under rubric v1.0. HeyMilo leads every one of the 7 criteria, Saville Assessment none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, HeyMilo 42 to Saville Assessment 40. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HeyMilo 83, Saville Assessment 42 — and at an 18% weight it carries 57% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

HeyMilo is filed under Screening AI, Saville Assessment under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHeyMiloSaville Assessment
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20232004

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 57% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HeyMilo 83 · Saville Assessment 42

    7.4 weighted points to HeyMilo

  2. 20% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HeyMilo 58 · Saville Assessment 50

    1.6 weighted points to HeyMilo

  3. 12% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HeyMilo 64 · Saville Assessment 55

    1.1 weighted points to HeyMilo

  4. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HeyMilo 62 · Saville Assessment 55

    1.1 weighted points to HeyMilo

  5. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HeyMilo 46 · Saville Assessment 38

    1.0 weighted points to HeyMilo

  6. 8% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HeyMilo 66 · Saville Assessment 60

    0.5 weighted points to HeyMilo

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HeyMilo 42 · Saville Assessment 40

    0.3 weighted points to HeyMilo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +12.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +12.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HeyMilo minus Saville Assessment.

CategoryWeightHeyMiloSaville AssessmentΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5850+8+1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%8342+41+7.4
FRIA Support15%4240+2+0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%6255+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%6455+9+1.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%4638+8+1.0
Customer Documentation8%6660+6+0.5
Total100%61 (D)48 (F)+13+12.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHeyMiloSaville Assessment
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%30Audit reportSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Audit reportSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%183Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain346Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo and Saville Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains, and 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HeyMilo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Saville Assessment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.