§ The result
HiBob leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
HiBob, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 12 points above HireLogic, filed under Video interview: 46 against 34 under rubric v1.0. HiBob takes all 7 criteria from HireLogic without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Bias Audit Transparency, HiBob 20 to HireLogic 15. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Post-Market Monitoring (HiBob 47, HireLogic 28) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (HiBob 55, HireLogic 42), the second being 21% of the weighted advantage HiBob holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HiBob
HiBob's Bob is an all-in-one HR platform whose Bob Hiring applicant tracking module uses AI to give each application an explainable match score against recruiter-defined criteria (AI CV Matching) and to draft job descriptions, interview scorecards and candidate emails.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
§ The record
HiBob is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HireLogic under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireLogic is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HiBob | HireLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2015 | Not recorded |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 21% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HiBob 55 · HireLogic 42
2.6 weighted points to HiBob
12% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HiBob 47 · HireLogic 28
2.3 weighted points to HiBob
15% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HiBob 57 · HireLogic 45
1.8 weighted points to HiBob
12% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HiBob 63 · HireLogic 48
1.8 weighted points to HiBob
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HiBob 35 · HireLogic 25
1.5 weighted points to HiBob
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HiBob 61 · HireLogic 45
1.3 weighted points to HiBob
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HiBob 20 · HireLogic 15
0.9 weighted points to HiBob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +12.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +12 beside that +12.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiBob minus HireLogic.
| Category | Weight | HiBob | HireLogic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 42 | +13 | +2.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 15 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 45 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 63 | 48 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 47 | 28 | +19 | +2.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 61 | 45 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 34 (F) | +12 | +12.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiBob | HireLogic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HiBob has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for HiBob, across 4 distinct source domains, and 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiBob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next