§ The result
HiBob leads Pulsifi on 6 of the 7 criteria.
HiBob, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 13 points above Pulsifi, filed under Assessment: 46 against 33 under rubric v1.0. Pulsifi is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: HiBob takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Human Oversight Design, HiBob 63 to Pulsifi 55. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (HiBob 55, Pulsifi 30, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 37% of the weighted advantage HiBob holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HiBob
HiBob's Bob is an all-in-one HR platform whose Bob Hiring applicant tracking module uses AI to give each application an explainable match score against recruiter-defined criteria (AI CV Matching) and to draft job descriptions, interview scorecards and candidate emails.
Vendor profile
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
§ The record
HiBob is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Pulsifi is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HiBob | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | SG |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HiBob 55 · Pulsifi 30
5.0 weighted points to HiBob
15% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HiBob 57 · Pulsifi 40
2.5 weighted points to HiBob
12% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HiBob 47 · Pulsifi 28
2.3 weighted points to HiBob
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HiBob 35 · Pulsifi 25
1.5 weighted points to HiBob
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HiBob 61 · Pulsifi 46
1.2 weighted points to HiBob
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HiBob 63 · Pulsifi 55
1.0 weighted points to HiBob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +13.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +13.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiBob minus Pulsifi.
| Category | Weight | HiBob | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 30 | +25 | +5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 20 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 40 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 63 | 55 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 47 | 28 | +19 | +2.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 61 | 46 | +15 | +1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 33 (F) | +13 | +13.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiBob | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HiBob has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 69 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for HiBob, across 4 distinct source domains, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiBob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next