HomeCompareHiBob vs Talview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HiBob vs Talview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

4 points separate HiBob and Talview.

HiBob holds a 4-point edge over Talview under rubric v1.0, 46 to 42, across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. Talview takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 6 for HiBob, whose share includes Post-Market Monitoring. Bias Audit Transparency is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Talview — HiBob 20, Talview 38, on an 18% weight — which is 100% of the weighted advantage Talview holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.

§ The record

HiBob is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Talview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHiBobTalview
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersGBUS
Founded20152012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 31% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HiBob 20 · Talview 38

    3.2 weighted points to Talview

  2. 12% weight · 48% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HiBob 47 · Talview 32

    1.8 weighted points to HiBob

  3. 15% weight · 62% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HiBob 35 · Talview 25

    1.5 weighted points to HiBob

  4. 15% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HiBob 57 · Talview 48

    1.3 weighted points to HiBob

  5. 20% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HiBob 55 · Talview 50

    1.0 weighted points to HiBob

  6. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HiBob 63 · Talview 55

    1.0 weighted points to HiBob

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HiBob 61 · Talview 52

    0.7 weighted points to HiBob

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +4.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +4.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HiBob minus Talview.

CategoryWeightHiBobTalviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5550+5+1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2038-18-3.2
FRIA Support15%3525+10+1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5748+9+1.3
Human Oversight Design12%6355+8+1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%4732+15+1.8
Customer Documentation8%6152+9+0.7
Total100%46 (F)42 (F)+4+4.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHiBobTalview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%297Sources on the vendor's own domain116Sources on the vendor's own domain

HiBob has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for HiBob, across 4 distinct source domains, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
HiBob last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.