HomeCompareHighMatch vs Paycor

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HighMatch vs Paycor

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

HighMatch leads Paycor on all 7 criteria.

HighMatch (Assessment) edges Paycor (ATS-integrated) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 43 to 40. HighMatch is ahead of Paycor on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Data Governance Disclosure at HighMatch 52 to Paycor 50. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (HighMatch 45, Paycor 40, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 27% of the weighted advantage HighMatch holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

HighMatch is filed under Assessment AI, Paycor under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only HighMatch is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHighMatchPaycor
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20051990

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 27% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HighMatch 45 · Paycor 40

    1.0 weighted points to HighMatch

  2. 18% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HighMatch 30 · Paycor 25

    0.9 weighted points to HighMatch

  3. 12% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HighMatch 60 · Paycor 55

    0.6 weighted points to HighMatch

  4. 15% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HighMatch 30 · Paycor 27

    0.4 weighted points to HighMatch

  5. 15% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HighMatch 52 · Paycor 50

    0.3 weighted points to HighMatch

  6. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HighMatch 40 · Paycor 38

    0.2 weighted points to HighMatch

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HighMatch 58 · Paycor 55

    0.2 weighted points to HighMatch

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HighMatch minus Paycor.

CategoryWeightHighMatchPaycorΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4540+5+1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3025+5+0.9
FRIA Support15%3027+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5250+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%6055+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4038+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%5855+3+0.2
Total100%43 (F)40 (F)+3+3.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHighMatchPaycor
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%60Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%314Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain246Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HighMatch has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Paycor has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HighMatch and Paycor sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for HighMatch, across 2 distinct source domains, and 30 for Paycor, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HighMatch last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Paycor last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.