Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HiPeople vs Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
HiPeople
HiPeople is a Berlin-based hiring platform combining a 400+ test skills and personality assessment library, automated AI reference checks, AI resume/application screening that scores candidates against job criteria, and AI screening calls.
Vendor profile
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is an AI talent-sourcing search engine that lets recruiters find, rank, and reach candidates across 800M+ public profiles using natural-language queries instead of Boolean search, with an "Autopilot" agent that scores and ranks profiles against job criteria.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiPeople minus Juicebox (PeopleGPT).
| Category | Weight | HiPeople | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 62 | 52 | +10 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 84 | 84 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 35 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 56 | +2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 50 | +12 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 55 | +5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 60 | +6 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 57 (F) | +4 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
HiPeople
31 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 16
- public statement
- 2
- absence
- 8
- audit report
- 5
Evidence count
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
16 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 8
- absence
- 4
- audit report
- 3
- public statement
- 1