Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HiPeople vs Paradox
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
HiPeople
HiPeople is a Berlin-based hiring platform combining a 400+ test skills and personality assessment library, automated AI reference checks, AI resume/application screening that scores candidates against job criteria, and AI screening calls.
61
DConcerning
Vendor profile
Paradox
Conversational AI ("Olivia") that screens, schedules, and engages candidates over chat and SMS, often deployed on top of an existing ATS.
41
FSubstantial gaps
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiPeople minus Paradox.
| Category | Weight | HiPeople | Paradox | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 62 | 40 | +22 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 84 | 50 | +34 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 45 | +13 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 50 | +12 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 35 | +25 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 45 | +21 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 41 (F) | +20 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
HiPeople
31 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 16
- public statement
- 2
- absence
- 8
- audit report
- 5
Evidence count
Paradox
10 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 5
- absence
- 2
- audit report
- 1
- public statement
- 2