§ The result
2 points separate Metaview and HiredScore.
Metaview (Screening) edges HiredScore (Sourcing) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 54 to 52. Metaview leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while HiredScore leads 1, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 1 is level. Article 11 Technical Documentation is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to HiredScore — HiredScore 65, Metaview 38, on a 20% weight — which is 100% of the weighted advantage HiredScore holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HiredScore
AI-driven talent orchestration layer that ranks and routes candidates within an existing ATS. Acquired by Workday in 2024.
Vendor profile
Metaview
Metaview is an AI recruiting platform whose agents transcribe and summarize interviews into structured notes and scorecards, and whose Application Review feature screens and ranks inbound applicants against an auto-generated Ideal Candidate Profile with fit ratings.
§ The record
HiredScore is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Metaview under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: ATS-integrated.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Metaview is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HiredScore | Metaview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HiredScore 65 · Metaview 38
5.4 weighted points to HiredScore
18% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HiredScore 55 · Metaview 80
4.5 weighted points to Metaview
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HiredScore 35 · Metaview 48
1.6 weighted points to Metaview
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HiredScore 55 · Metaview 60
0.8 weighted points to Metaview
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HiredScore 30 · Metaview 33
0.4 weighted points to Metaview
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HiredScore 60 · Metaview 62
0.2 weighted points to Metaview
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -2.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -2.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiredScore minus Metaview.
| Category | Weight | HiredScore | Metaview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 38 | +27 | +5.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 55 | 80 | -25 | -4.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 33 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 48 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 62 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 52 (F) | 54 (F) | -2 | -2.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiredScore | Metaview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 2 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 13 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HiredScore has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Metaview has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiredScore and Metaview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 25 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 9 for HiredScore, across 1 distinct source domain, and 16 for Metaview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiredScore last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Metaview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next