§ The result
HiredScore leads Moonhub on all 7 criteria.
HiredScore finishes 22 points clear of Moonhub inside the Sourcing cohort under rubric v1.0: 52 against 30. HiredScore leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Moonhub leads none. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Bias Audit Transparency (HiredScore 55, Moonhub 18) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (HiredScore 65, Moonhub 30), the second being 33% of the weighted advantage HiredScore holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HiredScore
AI-driven talent orchestration layer that ranks and routes candidates within an existing ATS. Acquired by Workday in 2024.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
§ The record
HiredScore and Moonhub are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Moonhub is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | HiredScore | Moonhub |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2022 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HiredScore 65 · Moonhub 30
7.0 weighted points to HiredScore
18% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HiredScore 55 · Moonhub 18
6.7 weighted points to HiredScore
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HiredScore 55 · Moonhub 40
2.3 weighted points to HiredScore
8% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HiredScore 60 · Moonhub 38
1.8 weighted points to HiredScore
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HiredScore 35 · Moonhub 22
1.6 weighted points to HiredScore
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HiredScore 60 · Moonhub 48
1.4 weighted points to HiredScore
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HiredScore 30 · Moonhub 25
0.8 weighted points to HiredScore
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +21.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +22 beside that +21.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiredScore minus Moonhub.
| Category | Weight | HiredScore | Moonhub | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 30 | +35 | +7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 55 | 18 | +37 | +6.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 38 | +22 | +1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 52 (F) | 30 (F) | +22 | +21.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiredScore | Moonhub | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 2 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HiredScore has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiredScore sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 22 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 9 for HiredScore, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiredScore last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next