§ The result
Pinpoint leads hireEZ on all 7 criteria.
Pinpoint finishes 15 points clear of hireEZ under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 42 — across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Pinpoint leads every one of the 7 criteria, hireEZ none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, hireEZ 58 to Pinpoint 64. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — hireEZ 38, Pinpoint 72 — and at a 20% weight it carries 45% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
hireEZ
AI-powered outbound recruiting platform that sources, matches, screens, engages, and schedules candidates on top of a customer's existing ATS.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ The record
hireEZ is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Pinpoint under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | hireEZ | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | JE |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
hireEZ 38 · Pinpoint 72
6.8 weighted points to Pinpoint
18% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
hireEZ 30 · Pinpoint 42
2.2 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 72% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
hireEZ 25 · Pinpoint 38
1.9 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
hireEZ 38 · Pinpoint 52
1.7 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
hireEZ 60 · Pinpoint 68
1.2 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
hireEZ 58 · Pinpoint 64
0.7 weighted points to Pinpoint
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
hireEZ 58 · Pinpoint 66
0.6 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -15.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is hireEZ minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | hireEZ | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 72 | -34 | -6.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 68 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 52 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 66 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 57 (F) | -15 | -15.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | hireEZ | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
hireEZ has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for hireEZ, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- hireEZ last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next