HomeComparehireEZ vs Recruit CRM

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

hireEZ vs Recruit CRM

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

2 points separate hireEZ and Recruit CRM.

hireEZ holds a 2-point edge over Recruit CRM under rubric v1.0, 42 to 40, across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. The criteria split evenly, 3 each to hireEZ and Recruit CRM, with 1 level, and the weighted points on the side hireEZ holds, headed by Bias Audit Transparency, settle the total. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — hireEZ 30, Recruit CRM 20 — and at an 18% weight it carries 51% of the weighted advantage hireEZ holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

hireEZ is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Recruit CRM under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only hireEZ is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordhireEZRecruit CRM
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded2015Not recorded

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 33% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    hireEZ 30 · Recruit CRM 20

    1.8 weighted points to hireEZ

  2. 15% weight · 57% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    hireEZ 25 · Recruit CRM 34

    1.3 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  3. 15% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    hireEZ 60 · Recruit CRM 54

    0.9 weighted points to hireEZ

  4. 20% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    hireEZ 38 · Recruit CRM 34

    0.8 weighted points to hireEZ

  5. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    hireEZ 38 · Recruit CRM 42

    0.5 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    hireEZ 58 · Recruit CRM 60

    0.2 weighted points to Recruit CRM

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +1.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is hireEZ minus Recruit CRM.

CategoryWeighthireEZRecruit CRMΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3834+4+0.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%3020+10+1.8
FRIA Support15%2534-9-1.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%6054+6+0.9
Human Oversight Design12%5858--
Post-Market Monitoring12%3842-4-0.5
Customer Documentation8%5860-2-0.2
Total100%42 (F)40 (F)+2+1.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeighthireEZRecruit CRM
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—21—
FRIA Support15%01—21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%95Sources on the vendor's own domain305Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

hireEZ has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for hireEZ, across 1 distinct source domain, and 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
hireEZ last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruit CRM last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.