§ The result
Interviewer.AI leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 scores the Video interview entries Interviewer.AI and HireLogic at 47 and 34, a gap of 13 points. Interviewer.AI takes all 7 criteria and HireLogic none of them; the nearest contest is Post-Market Monitoring, HireLogic 28 to Interviewer.AI 32. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (HireLogic 15, Interviewer.AI 35, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 29% of the weighted advantage Interviewer.AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
§ The record
HireLogic and Interviewer.AI are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | HireLogic | Interviewer.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · Interviewer.AI 35
3.6 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
15% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · Interviewer.AI 60
2.3 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
20% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · Interviewer.AI 52
2.0 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · Interviewer.AI 35
1.5 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · Interviewer.AI 60
1.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · Interviewer.AI 58
1.0 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · Interviewer.AI 32
0.5 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus Interviewer.AI.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | Interviewer.AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 52 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 35 | -20 | -3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 32 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 47 (F) | -13 | -12.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | Interviewer.AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next