§ The result
Jobylon leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
Jobylon sits 14 points above HireLogic under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 34 — with Jobylon filed under ATS-integrated and HireLogic under Video interview. Jobylon is ahead of HireLogic on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at HireLogic 25 to Jobylon 36. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap (HireLogic 28, Jobylon 45) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (HireLogic 42, Jobylon 55), 20% of the weighted advantage Jobylon builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
Jobylon
Jobylon is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking system and talent CRM for enterprise employers whose optional AI features score each applicant's CV against the job description, suggest existing candidates for other open roles, draft job ads and screening questions, and run candidate screening and interview scheduling over WhatsApp, SMS and email.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, Jobylon under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only HireLogic is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HireLogic | Jobylon |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SE |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2011 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 20% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · Jobylon 55
2.6 weighted points to Jobylon
18% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · Jobylon 28
2.3 weighted points to Jobylon
12% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · Jobylon 45
2.0 weighted points to Jobylon
15% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · Jobylon 58
1.9 weighted points to Jobylon
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · Jobylon 36
1.6 weighted points to Jobylon
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · Jobylon 60
1.4 weighted points to Jobylon
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · Jobylon 60
1.2 weighted points to Jobylon
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -14 beside that -13.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus Jobylon.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | Jobylon | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 55 | -13 | -2.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 28 | -13 | -2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 36 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 45 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 48 (F) | -14 | -13.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | Jobylon | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobylon last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next