§ The result
Manatal leads HireLogic by 7 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Manatal, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 41 and HireLogic, filed under Video interview, on 34, 7 points apart. HireLogic takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them, against 6 for Manatal, whose share includes Post-Market Monitoring. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — HireLogic takes Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20%, HireLogic 42 to Manatal 33, 100% of the weighted advantage HireLogic holds — while the widest raw gap sits on Customer Documentation, HireLogic 45 to Manatal 62.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
Manatal
Cloud-based applicant tracking system and recruitment CRM for agencies and HR teams, featuring an AI engine that scores and ranks candidates against job requirements and an asynchronous AI video Interviewer.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, Manatal under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | HireLogic | Manatal |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Low |
| Headquarters | US | TH |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 18% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · Manatal 33
1.8 weighted points to HireLogic
12% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · Manatal 43
1.8 weighted points to Manatal
12% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · Manatal 60
1.4 weighted points to Manatal
8% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · Manatal 62
1.4 weighted points to Manatal
18% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · Manatal 22
1.3 weighted points to Manatal
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · Manatal 33
1.2 weighted points to Manatal
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · Manatal 52
1.1 weighted points to Manatal
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -6.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -6.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus Manatal.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | Manatal | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 33 | +9 | +1.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 22 | -7 | -1.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 33 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 52 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 43 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 62 | -17 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 41 (F) | -7 | -6.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | Manatal | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 15 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Manatal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Manatal, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Manatal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next