§ The result
Oracle Recruiting leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
Oracle Recruiting finishes 15 points clear of HireLogic under rubric v1.0 — 49 against 34 — across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. Oracle Recruiting is ahead of HireLogic on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at HireLogic 25 to Oracle Recruiting 35. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HireLogic 42, Oracle Recruiting 60, 20% weight), is only 25% of the weighted advantage Oracle Recruiting builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
Oracle Recruiting
Oracle Recruiting (part of Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, formerly Oracle Recruiting Cloud) is an enterprise applicant tracking system whose embedded AI suggests and ranks candidates, finds similar candidates, and generates 0-5 generative-AI match ratings against job requisitions to assist recruiters.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, Oracle Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only HireLogic is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HireLogic | Oracle Recruiting |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | Not recorded | 1977 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 25% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · Oracle Recruiting 60
3.6 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
18% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · Oracle Recruiting 30
2.7 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
15% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · Oracle Recruiting 60
2.3 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
15% weight · 70% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · Oracle Recruiting 35
1.5 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · Oracle Recruiting 60
1.4 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · Oracle Recruiting 40
1.4 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · Oracle Recruiting 62
1.4 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -14.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -14.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus Oracle Recruiting.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | Oracle Recruiting | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 60 | -18 | -3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 30 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 40 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 62 | -17 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 49 (F) | -15 | -14.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | Oracle Recruiting | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 13 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.