HomeCompareHireLogic vs Pillar

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireLogic vs Pillar

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Pillar leads HireLogic on 4 of the 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, Pillar, filed under Screening, finishes on 40 and HireLogic, filed under Video interview, on 34, 6 points apart. HireLogic is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Pillar takes 4, the remaining 3 are level, and the nearest of those 4 is FRIA Support, HireLogic 25 to Pillar 30. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireLogic 15, Pillar 38 — and at an 18% weight it carries 70% of the weighted advantage Pillar holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, Pillar under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.

RecordHireLogicPillar
Price tierLowMid
HeadquartersUSUS
FoundedNot recorded2019

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireLogic 15 · Pillar 38

    4.1 weighted points to Pillar

  2. 15% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireLogic 25 · Pillar 30

    0.8 weighted points to Pillar

  3. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireLogic 28 · Pillar 33

    0.6 weighted points to Pillar

  4. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireLogic 45 · Pillar 50

    0.4 weighted points to Pillar

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -5.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireLogic minus Pillar.

CategoryWeightHireLogicPillarΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4242--
Bias Audit Transparency18%1538-23-4.1
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%4545--
Human Oversight Design12%4848--
Post-Market Monitoring12%2833-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%4550-5-0.4
Total100%34 (F)40 (F)-6-5.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireLogicPillar
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%236Sources on the vendor's own domain127Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Pillar has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Pillar, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
HireLogic last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pillar last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.