§ The result
Hireology leads myInterview on all 7 criteria.
Hireology finishes 20 points clear of myInterview under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 37 — across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. Hireology leads every one of the 7 criteria, myInterview none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Hireology 57 to myInterview 48. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Hireology 83, myInterview 35) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 44% of the weighted advantage Hireology holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Hireology
Hireology is an applicant tracking and hiring platform for multi-location auto dealers, healthcare providers and hospitality operators. Its AI features score applicants against employer-defined criteria (AI Match) and run rubric-scored, voice-based first-round screening interviews (AI Interview).
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
§ The record
Hireology is filed under ATS-integrated AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only myInterview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Hireology | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2010 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Hireology 83 · myInterview 35
8.6 weighted points to Hireology
12% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Hireology 59 · myInterview 33
3.1 weighted points to Hireology
20% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Hireology 50 · myInterview 38
2.4 weighted points to Hireology
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Hireology 35 · myInterview 25
1.5 weighted points to Hireology
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Hireology 52 · myInterview 42
1.5 weighted points to Hireology
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Hireology 58 · myInterview 40
1.4 weighted points to Hireology
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Hireology 57 · myInterview 48
1.1 weighted points to Hireology
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +19.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +20 beside that +19.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Hireology minus myInterview.
| Category | Weight | Hireology | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 38 | +12 | +2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 35 | +48 | +8.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 42 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 48 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 59 | 33 | +26 | +3.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 40 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 37 (F) | +20 | +19.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Hireology | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
Hireology has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Hireology and myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Hireology, across 2 distinct source domains, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Hireology last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next