§ The result
iMocha leads HirePro on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, iMocha (Assessment) opens an 18-point lead on HirePro (Screening), 56 to 38. iMocha takes all 7 criteria and HirePro none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, HirePro 55 to iMocha 64. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HirePro 30, iMocha 68 — and at a 20% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage iMocha holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HirePro
HirePro's AI Recruiter matches resumes to a job, shortlists candidates and runs AI-led interviews that score each answer with written reasoning and a fraud and identity check, alongside proctored assessments, video interviews and campus-hiring workflows.
Vendor profile
iMocha
iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment and skills-intelligence platform that evaluates candidates and employees across technical, cognitive, coding, and soft skills for hiring and internal talent management, including AI-based coding simulators and an AI video interviewer (Tara).
§ The record
HirePro is filed under Screening AI, iMocha under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HirePro | iMocha |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | IN |
| Founded | 2004 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HirePro 30 · iMocha 68
7.6 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HirePro 50 · iMocha 66
2.4 weighted points to iMocha
18% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HirePro 33 · iMocha 44
2.0 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HirePro 25 · iMocha 38
1.9 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HirePro 35 · iMocha 48
1.6 weighted points to iMocha
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HirePro 52 · iMocha 66
1.1 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HirePro 55 · iMocha 64
1.1 weighted points to iMocha
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HirePro minus iMocha.
| Category | Weight | HirePro | iMocha | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 68 | -38 | -7.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 33 | 44 | -11 | -2.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 66 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 48 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 66 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 56 (F) | -18 | -17.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HirePro | iMocha | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 21 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; iMocha has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for iMocha sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain, and 26 for iMocha, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HirePro last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- iMocha last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next