§ The result
Interviewer.AI leads HirePro by 9 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Interviewer.AI, filed under Video interview, finishes on 47 and HirePro, filed under Screening, on 38, 9 points apart. HirePro takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 6 for Interviewer.AI, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HirePro 30, Interviewer.AI 52 — and at a 20% weight it carries 50% of the weighted advantage Interviewer.AI holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HirePro
HirePro's AI Recruiter matches resumes to a job, shortlists candidates and runs AI-led interviews that score each answer with written reasoning and a fraud and identity check, alongside proctored assessments, video interviews and campus-hiring workflows.
Vendor profile
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
§ The record
HirePro is filed under Screening AI, Interviewer.AI under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HirePro | Interviewer.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | SG |
| Founded | 2004 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HirePro 30 · Interviewer.AI 52
4.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HirePro 25 · Interviewer.AI 35
1.5 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HirePro 50 · Interviewer.AI 60
1.5 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HirePro 55 · Interviewer.AI 60
0.6 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HirePro 52 · Interviewer.AI 58
0.5 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
18% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HirePro 33 · Interviewer.AI 35
0.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HirePro 35 · Interviewer.AI 32
0.4 weighted points to HirePro
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -8.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HirePro minus Interviewer.AI.
| Category | Weight | HirePro | Interviewer.AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 52 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 33 | 35 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 32 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 47 (F) | -9 | -8.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HirePro | Interviewer.AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HirePro last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next