HomeCompareHirePro vs Loxo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HirePro vs Loxo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

HirePro takes the total, Loxo takes more of the criteria.

HirePro (Screening) edges Loxo (Sourcing) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 38 to 37. Loxo leads more of the criteria than HirePro — 3 to 2 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which HirePro leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to HirePro. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HirePro 33, Loxo 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 80% of the weighted advantage HirePro holds across the 2 criteria it leads.

§ The record

HirePro is filed under Screening AI, Loxo under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only HirePro is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireProLoxo
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersINUS
Founded20042012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HirePro 33 · Loxo 20

    2.3 weighted points to HirePro

  2. 15% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HirePro 25 · Loxo 30

    0.8 weighted points to Loxo

  3. 12% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HirePro 55 · Loxo 50

    0.6 weighted points to HirePro

  4. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HirePro 35 · Loxo 40

    0.6 weighted points to Loxo

  5. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HirePro 52 · Loxo 58

    0.5 weighted points to Loxo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +1.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HirePro minus Loxo.

CategoryWeightHireProLoxoΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3030--
Bias Audit Transparency18%3320+13+2.3
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5050--
Human Oversight Design12%5550+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3540-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%5258-6-0.5
Total100%38 (F)37 (F)+1+1.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireProLoxo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21—11—
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%216Sources on the vendor's own domain127Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Loxo has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Loxo, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
HirePro last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Loxo last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.