§ The result
Maki People leads HirePro on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 29 points between Maki People (Assessment) and HirePro (Screening): 67 (D) for Maki People, 38 (F) for HirePro. Maki People leads every one of the 7 criteria and 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; HirePro leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (HirePro 33, Maki People 80, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 30% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HirePro
HirePro's AI Recruiter matches resumes to a job, shortlists candidates and runs AI-led interviews that score each answer with written reasoning and a fraud and identity check, alongside proctored assessments, video interviews and campus-hiring workflows.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
§ The record
HirePro is filed under Screening AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HirePro | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | IN | FR |
| Founded | 2004 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 30% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HirePro 33 · Maki People 80
8.5 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HirePro 30 · Maki People 64
6.8 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 73% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HirePro 25 · Maki People 62
5.5 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HirePro 35 · Maki People 55
2.4 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HirePro 50 · Maki People 64
2.1 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HirePro 52 · Maki People 74
1.8 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HirePro 55 · Maki People 66
1.3 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -28.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 28.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -29 beside that -28.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HirePro minus Maki People.
| Category | Weight | HirePro | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 64 | -34 | -6.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 33 | 80 | -47 | -8.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 62 | -37 | -5.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 64 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 66 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 55 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 74 | -22 | -1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 67 (D) | -29 | -28.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HirePro | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HirePro last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next