§ The result
The Predictive Index leads HirePro by 10 points.
The Predictive Index sits 10 points above HirePro under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 38 — with The Predictive Index filed under Assessment and HirePro under Screening. The Predictive Index leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while HirePro leads 1, including Human Oversight Design. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (HirePro 30, The Predictive Index 50) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 40% of the weighted advantage The Predictive Index holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HirePro
HirePro's AI Recruiter matches resumes to a job, shortlists candidates and runs AI-led interviews that score each answer with written reasoning and a fraud and identity check, alongside proctored assessments, video interviews and campus-hiring workflows.
Vendor profile
The Predictive Index
The Predictive Index provides validated behavioral and cognitive psychometric assessments used to screen, hire, and develop employees and design teams, alongside AI-assisted talent-management software.
§ The record
HirePro is filed under Screening AI, The Predictive Index under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HirePro | The Predictive Index |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2004 | 1955 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HirePro 30 · The Predictive Index 50
4.0 weighted points to The Predictive Index
18% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HirePro 33 · The Predictive Index 45
2.2 weighted points to The Predictive Index
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HirePro 25 · The Predictive Index 35
1.5 weighted points to The Predictive Index
12% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HirePro 35 · The Predictive Index 43
1.0 weighted points to The Predictive Index
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HirePro 50 · The Predictive Index 55
0.8 weighted points to The Predictive Index
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HirePro 52 · The Predictive Index 60
0.6 weighted points to The Predictive Index
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HirePro 55 · The Predictive Index 52
0.4 weighted points to HirePro
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -9.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HirePro minus The Predictive Index.
| Category | Weight | HirePro | The Predictive Index | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 50 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 33 | 45 | -12 | -2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 55 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 43 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 48 (F) | -10 | -9.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HirePro | The Predictive Index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; The Predictive Index has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain, and 24 for The Predictive Index, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HirePro last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- The Predictive Index last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next