HomeCompareHirePro vs Recruit CRM

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HirePro vs Recruit CRM

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

2 points separate Recruit CRM and HirePro.

Recruit CRM holds a 2-point edge over HirePro under rubric v1.0, 40 to 38, across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. HirePro takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 6 for Recruit CRM, whose share includes FRIA Support. Bias Audit Transparency is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to HirePro — HirePro 33, Recruit CRM 20, on an 18% weight — which is 100% of the weighted advantage HirePro holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.

§ The record

HirePro is filed under Screening AI, Recruit CRM under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only HirePro is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireProRecruit CRM
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersINUS
Founded2004Not recorded

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 34% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HirePro 33 · Recruit CRM 20

    2.3 weighted points to HirePro

  2. 15% weight · 53% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HirePro 25 · Recruit CRM 34

    1.3 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  3. 12% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HirePro 35 · Recruit CRM 42

    0.8 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  4. 20% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HirePro 30 · Recruit CRM 34

    0.8 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  5. 8% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HirePro 52 · Recruit CRM 60

    0.6 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  6. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HirePro 50 · Recruit CRM 54

    0.6 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HirePro 55 · Recruit CRM 58

    0.4 weighted points to Recruit CRM

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -2.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -2.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HirePro minus Recruit CRM.

CategoryWeightHireProRecruit CRMΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3034-4-0.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%3320+13+2.3
FRIA Support15%2534-9-1.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5054-4-0.6
Human Oversight Design12%5558-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3542-7-0.8
Customer Documentation8%5260-8-0.6
Total100%38 (F)40 (F)-2-2.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireProRecruit CRM
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21—21—
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%216Sources on the vendor's own domain305Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain, and 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HirePro last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruit CRM last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.