§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads HirePro on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Workday Recruiting AI (ATS-integrated) opens an 18-point lead on HirePro (Screening), 56 to 38. HirePro is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Workday Recruiting AI takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Data Governance Disclosure, HirePro 50 to Workday Recruiting AI 55. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HirePro 30, Workday Recruiting AI 70 — and at a 20% weight it carries 46% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HirePro
HirePro's AI Recruiter matches resumes to a job, shortlists candidates and runs AI-led interviews that score each answer with written reasoning and a fraud and identity check, alongside proctored assessments, video interviews and campus-hiring workflows.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
HirePro is filed under Screening AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only HirePro is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HirePro | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2004 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HirePro 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
8.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
18% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HirePro 33 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
4.9 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HirePro 25 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
1.5 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HirePro 55 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HirePro 52 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HirePro 50 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
0.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -17.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HirePro minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | HirePro | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 70 | -40 | -8.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 33 | 60 | -27 | -4.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 55 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 65 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 65 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 56 (F) | -18 | -17.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HirePro | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HirePro last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next