§ The result
Interviewer.AI leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.
Interviewer.AI, filed under Video interview, comes out 13 points above HireQuotient, filed under Sourcing: 47 against 34 under rubric v1.0. Interviewer.AI takes all 7 criteria and HireQuotient none of them; the nearest contest is Post-Market Monitoring, HireQuotient 30 to Interviewer.AI 32. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Data Governance Disclosure (HireQuotient 40, Interviewer.AI 60) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (HireQuotient 35, Interviewer.AI 52), the second being 27% of the weighted advantage Interviewer.AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Vendor profile
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
§ The record
HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Interviewer.AI under Video interview AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Assessment.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HireQuotient | Interviewer.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | SG | SG |
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireQuotient 35 · Interviewer.AI 52
3.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireQuotient 18 · Interviewer.AI 35
3.1 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
15% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireQuotient 40 · Interviewer.AI 60
3.0 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireQuotient 22 · Interviewer.AI 35
1.9 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireQuotient 50 · Interviewer.AI 58
0.6 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireQuotient 57 · Interviewer.AI 60
0.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireQuotient 30 · Interviewer.AI 32
0.2 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireQuotient minus Interviewer.AI.
| Category | Weight | HireQuotient | Interviewer.AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 52 | -17 | -3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 35 | -17 | -3.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 60 | -20 | -3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 60 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 32 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 58 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 47 (F) | -13 | -12.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireQuotient | Interviewer.AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next