HomeCompareHireQuotient vs The Predictive Index

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireQuotient vs The Predictive Index

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

The Predictive Index leads HireQuotient by 14 points.

The Predictive Index sits 14 points above HireQuotient under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 34 — with The Predictive Index filed under Assessment and HireQuotient under Sourcing. The Predictive Index leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while HireQuotient leads 1, including Human Oversight Design. The advantage The Predictive Index holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HireQuotient 18, The Predictive Index 45, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 34% of the weighted points The Predictive Index gains across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, The Predictive Index under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireQuotientThe Predictive Index
Price tierLowMid
HeadquartersSGUS
Founded20211955

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireQuotient 18 · The Predictive Index 45

    4.9 weighted points to The Predictive Index

  2. 20% weight · 52% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireQuotient 35 · The Predictive Index 50

    3.0 weighted points to The Predictive Index

  3. 15% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireQuotient 40 · The Predictive Index 55

    2.3 weighted points to The Predictive Index

  4. 15% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireQuotient 22 · The Predictive Index 35

    1.9 weighted points to The Predictive Index

  5. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireQuotient 30 · The Predictive Index 43

    1.6 weighted points to The Predictive Index

  6. 8% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireQuotient 50 · The Predictive Index 60

    0.8 weighted points to The Predictive Index

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireQuotient 57 · The Predictive Index 52

    0.6 weighted points to HireQuotient

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -14 beside that -13.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireQuotient minus The Predictive Index.

CategoryWeightHireQuotientThe Predictive IndexΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3550-15-3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%1845-27-4.9
FRIA Support15%2235-13-1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%4055-15-2.3
Human Oversight Design12%5752+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3043-13-1.6
Customer Documentation8%5060-10-0.8
Total100%34 (F)48 (F)-14-13.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireQuotientThe Predictive Index
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain40Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%245Sources on the vendor's own domain186Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; The Predictive Index has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 24 for The Predictive Index, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
The Predictive Index last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.