HomeCompareHireQuotient vs Test Partnership

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireQuotient vs Test Partnership

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Test Partnership leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, Test Partnership (Assessment) opens a 16-point lead on HireQuotient (Sourcing), 50 to 34. Of the 7 criteria HireQuotient wins none, and the narrowest lead Test Partnership holds is on Human Oversight Design, HireQuotient 57 to Test Partnership 58. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HireQuotient 18, Test Partnership 48, 18% weight), is only 34% of the weighted advantage Test Partnership builds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Test Partnership under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireQuotientTest Partnership
Price tierLowMid
HeadquartersSGGB
Founded20212012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 34% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireQuotient 18 · Test Partnership 48

    5.4 weighted points to Test Partnership

  2. 20% weight · 62% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireQuotient 35 · Test Partnership 57

    4.4 weighted points to Test Partnership

  3. 15% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireQuotient 40 · Test Partnership 57

    2.5 weighted points to Test Partnership

  4. 15% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireQuotient 22 · Test Partnership 36

    2.1 weighted points to Test Partnership

  5. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireQuotient 50 · Test Partnership 62

    1.0 weighted points to Test Partnership

  6. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireQuotient 30 · Test Partnership 33

    0.4 weighted points to Test Partnership

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireQuotient 57 · Test Partnership 58

    0.1 weighted points to Test Partnership

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -15.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireQuotient minus Test Partnership.

CategoryWeightHireQuotientTest PartnershipΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3557-22-4.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%1848-30-5.4
FRIA Support15%2236-14-2.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%4057-17-2.5
Human Oversight Design12%5758-1-0.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%3033-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%5062-12-1.0
Total100%34 (F)50 (F)-16-15.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireQuotientTest Partnership
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%245Sources on the vendor's own domain266Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Test Partnership has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Test Partnership sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 32 for Test Partnership, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Test Partnership last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.