HomeCompareHireQuotient vs TestGorilla

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireQuotient vs TestGorilla

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

TestGorilla leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.

TestGorilla sits 13 points above HireQuotient under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 34 — with TestGorilla filed under Assessment and HireQuotient under Sourcing. TestGorilla takes all 7 criteria and HireQuotient none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, HireQuotient 57 to TestGorilla 60. The advantage TestGorilla holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HireQuotient 18, TestGorilla 38, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 29% of the weighted points TestGorilla gains across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, TestGorilla under Assessment AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Video interview.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireQuotientTestGorilla
Price tierLowMid
HeadquartersSGNL
Founded20212019

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 29% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireQuotient 18 · TestGorilla 38

    3.6 weighted points to TestGorilla

  2. 20% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireQuotient 35 · TestGorilla 52

    3.4 weighted points to TestGorilla

  3. 15% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireQuotient 40 · TestGorilla 56

    2.4 weighted points to TestGorilla

  4. 15% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireQuotient 22 · TestGorilla 30

    1.2 weighted points to TestGorilla

  5. 12% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireQuotient 30 · TestGorilla 38

    1.0 weighted points to TestGorilla

  6. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireQuotient 50 · TestGorilla 58

    0.6 weighted points to TestGorilla

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireQuotient 57 · TestGorilla 60

    0.4 weighted points to TestGorilla

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireQuotient minus TestGorilla.

CategoryWeightHireQuotientTestGorillaΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3552-17-3.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%1838-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%2230-8-1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%4056-16-2.4
Human Oversight Design12%5760-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3038-8-1.0
Customer Documentation8%5058-8-0.6
Total100%34 (F)47 (F)-13-12.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireQuotientTestGorilla
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%245Sources on the vendor's own domain145Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; TestGorilla has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for TestGorilla sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for TestGorilla, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
TestGorilla last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.