§ The result
3 points separate Toggl Hire and HireQuotient.
Toggl Hire (Assessment) edges HireQuotient (Sourcing) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 37 to 34. HireQuotient takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them, against 4 for Toggl Hire, whose share includes Data Governance Disclosure, and 1 is level. One criterion, Data Governance Disclosure, is both the widest raw gap (HireQuotient 40, Toggl Hire 55) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 15% weight it makes up 51% of the weighted advantage Toggl Hire holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Vendor profile
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
§ The record
HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Toggl Hire under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HireQuotient | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Low |
| Headquarters | SG | EE |
| Founded | 2021 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireQuotient 40 · Toggl Hire 55
2.3 weighted points to Toggl Hire
15% weight · 57% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireQuotient 22 · Toggl Hire 30
1.2 weighted points to Toggl Hire
20% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireQuotient 35 · Toggl Hire 30
1.0 weighted points to HireQuotient
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireQuotient 57 · Toggl Hire 52
0.6 weighted points to HireQuotient
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireQuotient 30 · Toggl Hire 35
0.6 weighted points to Toggl Hire
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireQuotient 18 · Toggl Hire 20
0.4 weighted points to Toggl Hire
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -2.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -2.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireQuotient minus Toggl Hire.
| Category | Weight | HireQuotient | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 20 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 30 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 52 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 37 (F) | -3 | -2.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireQuotient | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next