§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Workday Recruiting AI (ATS-integrated) opens a 22-point lead on HireQuotient (Sourcing), 56 to 34. Workday Recruiting AI takes all 7 criteria and HireQuotient none of them; the nearest contest is Post-Market Monitoring, HireQuotient 30 to Workday Recruiting AI 35. The advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HireQuotient 18, Workday Recruiting AI 60, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 35% of the weighted points Workday Recruiting AI gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only HireQuotient is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HireQuotient | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | SG | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireQuotient 18 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
7.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
20% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireQuotient 35 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
7.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireQuotient 40 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
2.3 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireQuotient 22 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
1.9 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireQuotient 50 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireQuotient 57 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireQuotient 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -21.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireQuotient minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | HireQuotient | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 70 | -35 | -7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 60 | -42 | -7.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 65 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 65 | -15 | -1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 56 (F) | -22 | -21.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireQuotient | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 40 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.