HomeCompareHireVue vs Pillar

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireVue vs Pillar

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

HireVue leads Pillar on all 7 criteria.

HireVue finishes 18 points clear of Pillar under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 40 — across the Video interview and Screening cohorts. HireVue leads every one of the 7 criteria, Pillar none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, HireVue 35 to Pillar 30. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireVue 80, Pillar 38 — and at an 18% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage HireVue holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

HireVue is filed under Video interview AI, Pillar under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Mobley v. Workday, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act.

RecordHireVuePillar
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20042019

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 43% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireVue 80 · Pillar 38

    7.6 weighted points to HireVue

  2. 20% weight · 69% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireVue 65 · Pillar 42

    4.6 weighted points to HireVue

  3. 15% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireVue 55 · Pillar 45

    1.5 weighted points to HireVue

  4. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireVue 60 · Pillar 48

    1.4 weighted points to HireVue

  5. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireVue 45 · Pillar 33

    1.4 weighted points to HireVue

  6. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireVue 35 · Pillar 30

    0.8 weighted points to HireVue

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireVue 55 · Pillar 50

    0.4 weighted points to HireVue

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +17.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +18 beside that +17.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireVue minus Pillar.

CategoryWeightHireVuePillarΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6542+23+4.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%8038+42+7.6
FRIA Support15%3530+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5545+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%6048+12+1.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4533+12+1.4
Customer Documentation8%5550+5+0.4
Total100%58 (F)40 (F)+18+17.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireVuePillar
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%1111
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%132Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain127Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Pillar has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HireVue sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains, and 19 for Pillar, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
HireVue last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pillar last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.