§ The result
HireVue leads Qureos on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 25 points between HireVue (Video interview) and Qureos (Screening): 58 for HireVue, 33 for Qureos. Of the 7 criteria Qureos wins none, and the narrowest lead HireVue holds is on Customer Documentation, HireVue 55 to Qureos 52. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HireVue 80, Qureos 12) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 49% of the weighted advantage HireVue holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HireVue
Asynchronous video interviewing platform with optional AI-driven assessment scoring of candidate responses.
Vendor profile
Qureos
Qureos is a Dubai-based AI recruiting platform whose Iris agents source candidates, score and rank applicants against recruiter-set criteria, and run AI voice and video interviews with personality scoring, alongside an ATS and a job-seeker marketplace focused on MENA and South Asia.
§ The record
HireVue is filed under Video interview AI, Qureos under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Mobley v. Workday, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | HireVue | Qureos |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AE |
| Founded | 2004 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireVue 80 · Qureos 12
12.2 weighted points to HireVue
20% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireVue 65 · Qureos 28
7.4 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireVue 55 · Qureos 44
1.6 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireVue 35 · Qureos 25
1.5 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireVue 45 · Qureos 35
1.2 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireVue 60 · Qureos 54
0.7 weighted points to HireVue
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireVue 55 · Qureos 52
0.2 weighted points to HireVue
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +24.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +25 beside that +24.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireVue minus Qureos.
| Category | Weight | HireVue | Qureos | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 28 | +37 | +7.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 12 | +68 | +12.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 44 | +11 | +1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 54 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 35 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 58 (F) | 33 (F) | +25 | +24.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireVue | Qureos | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HireVue sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains, and 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireVue last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Qureos last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next