§ The result
HireVue leads XOR on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 28 points between HireVue (Video interview) and XOR (Screening): 58 for HireVue, 30 for XOR. HireVue leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; XOR leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireVue 80, XOR 18 — and at an 18% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage HireVue holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HireVue
Asynchronous video interviewing platform with optional AI-driven assessment scoring of candidate responses.
Vendor profile
XOR
XOR is a text-first conversational-AI recruiting platform that pre-screens and scores high-volume and hourly candidates with recruiter-defined knockout/scoring questions over SMS, WhatsApp, and Messenger, then auto-schedules interviews on the recruiter's calendar.
§ The record
HireVue is filed under Video interview AI, XOR under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only HireVue is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HireVue | XOR |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2004 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireVue 80 · XOR 18
11.2 weighted points to HireVue
20% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireVue 65 · XOR 20
9.0 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireVue 60 · XOR 40
2.4 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireVue 55 · XOR 42
1.9 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireVue 35 · XOR 25
1.5 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireVue 45 · XOR 33
1.4 weighted points to HireVue
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireVue 55 · XOR 48
0.6 weighted points to HireVue
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +28.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 28.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +28 beside that +28.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireVue minus XOR.
| Category | Weight | HireVue | XOR | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 20 | +45 | +9.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 18 | +62 | +11.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 42 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 40 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 33 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 48 | +7 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 58 (F) | 30 (F) | +28 | +28.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireVue | XOR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; XOR has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HireVue sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains, and 18 for XOR, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireVue last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- XOR last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next