HomeCompareHogan Assessments vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Hogan Assessments vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads Hogan Assessments on all 7 criteria.

LinkedIn Recruiter sits 10 points above Hogan Assessments under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 47 — with LinkedIn Recruiter filed under Sourcing and Hogan Assessments under Assessment. LinkedIn Recruiter is ahead of Hogan Assessments on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at Hogan Assessments 36 to LinkedIn Recruiter 38. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Hogan Assessments 50, LinkedIn Recruiter 67, 20% weight), is only 35% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter builds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Hogan Assessments is filed under Assessment AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Hogan Assessments is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHogan AssessmentsLinkedIn Recruiter
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19872002

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Hogan Assessments 50 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67

    3.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 12% weight · 53% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Hogan Assessments 52 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66

    1.7 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 15% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Hogan Assessments 52 · LinkedIn Recruiter 62

    1.5 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 12% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Hogan Assessments 40 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 18% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Hogan Assessments 44 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    1.1 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Hogan Assessments 62 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68

    0.5 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Hogan Assessments 36 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38

    0.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -9.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Hogan Assessments minus LinkedIn Recruiter.

CategoryWeightHogan AssessmentsLinkedIn RecruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5067-17-3.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%4450-6-1.1
FRIA Support15%3638-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5262-10-1.5
Human Oversight Design12%5266-14-1.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%4050-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%6268-6-0.5
Total100%47 (F)57 (F)-10-9.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHogan AssessmentsLinkedIn Recruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%40Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%206Sources on the vendor's own domain345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Hogan Assessments last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.