HomeCompareHogan Assessments vs Paycor

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Hogan Assessments vs Paycor

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Hogan Assessments leads Paycor by 7 points.

Hogan Assessments scores 47 and Paycor 40 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Paycor takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Human Oversight Design among them, against 6 for Hogan Assessments, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Hogan Assessments 44, Paycor 25) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 43% of the weighted advantage Hogan Assessments holds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Hogan Assessments is filed under Assessment AI, Paycor under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Hogan Assessments is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHogan AssessmentsPaycor
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19871990

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 42% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Hogan Assessments 44 · Paycor 25

    3.4 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  2. 20% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Hogan Assessments 50 · Paycor 40

    2.0 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  3. 15% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Hogan Assessments 36 · Paycor 27

    1.3 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  4. 8% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Hogan Assessments 62 · Paycor 55

    0.6 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  5. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Hogan Assessments 52 · Paycor 55

    0.4 weighted points to Paycor

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Hogan Assessments 52 · Paycor 50

    0.3 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Hogan Assessments 40 · Paycor 38

    0.2 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +7.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +7.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Hogan Assessments minus Paycor.

CategoryWeightHogan AssessmentsPaycorΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5040+10+2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4425+19+3.4
FRIA Support15%3627+9+1.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5250+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5255-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4038+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%6255+7+0.6
Total100%47 (F)40 (F)+7+7.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHogan AssessmentsPaycor
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31—
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%40Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%206Sources on the vendor's own domain246Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Paycor has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Paycor sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain, and 30 for Paycor, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Hogan Assessments last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Paycor last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.