HomeCompareHogan Assessments vs RippleMatch

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Hogan Assessments vs RippleMatch

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

1 point separates Hogan Assessments and RippleMatch.

Hogan Assessments holds a 1-point edge over RippleMatch under rubric v1.0, 47 to 46, across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Hogan Assessments leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including FRIA Support, while RippleMatch leads 2, including Bias Audit Transparency. Bias Audit Transparency is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to RippleMatch — Hogan Assessments 44, RippleMatch 53, on an 18% weight — which is 73% of the weighted advantage RippleMatch holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Hogan Assessments is filed under Assessment AI, RippleMatch under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Hogan Assessments is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHogan AssessmentsRippleMatch
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19872016

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 31% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Hogan Assessments 44 · RippleMatch 53

    1.6 weighted points to RippleMatch

  2. 15% weight · 57% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Hogan Assessments 36 · RippleMatch 27

    1.3 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  3. 20% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Hogan Assessments 50 · RippleMatch 46

    0.8 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  4. 12% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Hogan Assessments 52 · RippleMatch 57

    0.6 weighted points to RippleMatch

  5. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Hogan Assessments 40 · RippleMatch 37

    0.4 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Hogan Assessments 52 · RippleMatch 50

    0.3 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Hogan Assessments 62 · RippleMatch 60

    0.2 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +0.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Hogan Assessments minus RippleMatch.

CategoryWeightHogan AssessmentsRippleMatchΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5046+4+0.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%4453-9-1.6
FRIA Support15%3627+9+1.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5250+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5257-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4037+3+0.4
Customer Documentation8%6260+2+0.2
Total100%47 (F)46 (F)+1+0.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHogan AssessmentsRippleMatch
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain71Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain71Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain71Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%40Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%206Sources on the vendor's own domain357Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; RippleMatch has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 35 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for RippleMatch sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 68 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain, and 42 for RippleMatch, across 5 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Hogan Assessments last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
RippleMatch last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.