HomeCompareHogan Assessments vs SeekOut

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Hogan Assessments vs SeekOut

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Hogan Assessments leads SeekOut on all 7 criteria.

Hogan Assessments sits 13 points above SeekOut under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 34 — with Hogan Assessments filed under Assessment and SeekOut under Sourcing. Hogan Assessments leads every one of the 7 criteria, SeekOut none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Bias Audit Transparency, Hogan Assessments 44 to SeekOut 40. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (Hogan Assessments 62, SeekOut 35) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Hogan Assessments 50, SeekOut 35), the second being 24% of the weighted advantage Hogan Assessments holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Hogan Assessments is filed under Assessment AI, SeekOut under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Hogan Assessments is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHogan AssessmentsSeekOut
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19872017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 24% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Hogan Assessments 50 · SeekOut 35

    3.0 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  2. 15% weight · 44% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Hogan Assessments 52 · SeekOut 35

    2.5 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  3. 8% weight · 61% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Hogan Assessments 62 · SeekOut 35

    2.2 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  4. 12% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Hogan Assessments 40 · SeekOut 25

    1.8 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  5. 15% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Hogan Assessments 36 · SeekOut 25

    1.6 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  6. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Hogan Assessments 52 · SeekOut 45

    0.8 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  7. 18% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Hogan Assessments 44 · SeekOut 40

    0.7 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +12.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +12.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Hogan Assessments minus SeekOut.

CategoryWeightHogan AssessmentsSeekOutΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5035+15+3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4440+4+0.7
FRIA Support15%3625+11+1.6
Data Governance Disclosure15%5235+17+2.5
Human Oversight Design12%5245+7+0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%4025+15+1.8
Customer Documentation8%6235+27+2.2
Total100%47 (F)34 (F)+13+12.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHogan AssessmentsSeekOut
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Customer Documentation8%40Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%206Sources on the vendor's own domain54Sources on the vendor's own domain

Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Hogan Assessments last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SeekOut last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.