HomeCompareHogan Assessments vs SmartRecruiters

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Hogan Assessments vs SmartRecruiters

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

SmartRecruiters leads Hogan Assessments on all 7 criteria.

SmartRecruiters finishes 15 points clear of Hogan Assessments under rubric v1.0 — 62 (D) against 47 (F) — across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. SmartRecruiters leads every one of the 7 criteria, Hogan Assessments none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Customer Documentation, Hogan Assessments 62 to SmartRecruiters 63. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Hogan Assessments 44, SmartRecruiters 78 — and at an 18% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage SmartRecruiters holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Hogan Assessments is filed under Assessment AI, SmartRecruiters under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Hogan Assessments is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHogan AssessmentsSmartRecruiters
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19872010

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 40% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Hogan Assessments 44 · SmartRecruiters 78

    6.1 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  2. 20% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Hogan Assessments 50 · SmartRecruiters 70

    4.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  3. 15% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Hogan Assessments 52 · SmartRecruiters 62

    1.5 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  4. 15% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Hogan Assessments 36 · SmartRecruiters 45

    1.3 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  5. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Hogan Assessments 52 · SmartRecruiters 62

    1.2 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  6. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Hogan Assessments 40 · SmartRecruiters 48

    1.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Hogan Assessments 62 · SmartRecruiters 63

    0.1 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -15.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Hogan Assessments minus SmartRecruiters.

CategoryWeightHogan AssessmentsSmartRecruitersΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5070-20-4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4478-34-6.1
FRIA Support15%3645-9-1.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5262-10-1.5
Human Oversight Design12%5262-10-1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4048-8-1.0
Customer Documentation8%6263-1-0.1
Total100%47 (F)62 (D)-15-15.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHogan AssessmentsSmartRecruiters
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain10Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%40Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%206Sources on the vendor's own domain112Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SmartRecruiters has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SmartRecruiters sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for SmartRecruiters, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Hogan Assessments last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SmartRecruiters last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.