§ The result
Humanly leads Intervue.io on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Humanly, filed under Screening, comes out 11 points above Intervue.io, filed under Video interview: 42 against 31 under rubric v1.0. Intervue.io is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Humanly takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Data Governance Disclosure, Humanly 40 to Intervue.io 38. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Humanly 40, Intervue.io 12 — and at an 18% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage Humanly holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
Humanly is filed under Screening AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Humanly | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Humanly 40 · Intervue.io 12
5.0 weighted points to Humanly
20% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Humanly 45 · Intervue.io 28
3.4 weighted points to Humanly
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Humanly 35 · Intervue.io 22
1.9 weighted points to Humanly
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Humanly 58 · Intervue.io 54
0.5 weighted points to Humanly
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Humanly 40 · Intervue.io 38
0.3 weighted points to Humanly
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Humanly 52 · Intervue.io 50
0.2 weighted points to Humanly
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +11.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Humanly minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | Humanly | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 28 | +17 | +3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 12 | +28 | +5.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 38 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 54 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 50 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 31 (F) | +11 | +11.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Humanly | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Humanly last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next