HomeCompareHumanly vs Jobma

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Humanly vs Jobma

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Jobma leads Humanly on 5 of the 7 criteria.

Jobma scores 49 and Humanly 42 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Video interview and Screening cohorts. Jobma leads 5 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 2 are level, so Humanly is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 5 Jobma leads is Human Oversight Design, Humanly 58 to Jobma 60. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Humanly 40, Jobma 56, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 34% of the weighted advantage Jobma holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Humanly is filed under Screening AI, Jobma under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHumanlyJobma
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20182012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 34% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Humanly 40 · Jobma 56

    2.4 weighted points to Jobma

  2. 20% weight · 62% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Humanly 45 · Jobma 55

    2.0 weighted points to Jobma

  3. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Humanly 30 · Jobma 44

    1.7 weighted points to Jobma

  4. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Humanly 52 · Jobma 62

    0.8 weighted points to Jobma

  5. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Humanly 58 · Jobma 60

    0.2 weighted points to Jobma

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -7.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -7.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Humanly minus Jobma.

CategoryWeightHumanlyJobmaΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4555-10-2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4040--
FRIA Support15%3535--
Data Governance Disclosure15%4056-16-2.4
Human Oversight Design12%5860-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3044-14-1.7
Customer Documentation8%5262-10-0.8
Total100%42 (F)49 (F)-7-7.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHumanlyJobma
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%1111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain40Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%126Sources on the vendor's own domain174Sources on the vendor's own domain

Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Jobma has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains, and 21 for Jobma, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Humanly last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Jobma last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.