Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Humanly vs Jobma
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
Vendor profile
Jobma
AI video interviewing platform offering one-way (pre-recorded), live, and agentic AI interviews with automated transcription and AI scoring of candidate video, audio, and written responses as recruiter decision-support.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Humanly minus Jobma.
| Category | Weight | Humanly | Jobma | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 55 | -10 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 40 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 35 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 56 | -16 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 60 | -2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 44 | -14 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 62 | -10 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 49 (F) | -7 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Humanly
18 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 9
- absence
- 6
- public statement
- 3
Evidence count
Jobma
21 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 13
- absence
- 4
- public statement
- 4