§ The result
Humanly takes the total, Willo takes more of the criteria.
Humanly (Screening) edges Willo (Video interview) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 42 to 41. Willo leads more of the criteria than Humanly — 4 to 3 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Humanly leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Humanly. Data Governance Disclosure is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Willo — Humanly 40, Willo 53, on a 15% weight — which is 59% of the weighted advantage Willo holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
Vendor profile
Willo
Willo is a browser-based asynchronous (one-way) video interview platform that lets employers collect recorded video, audio, multiple-choice and written candidate responses, then uses AI to transcribe, summarize, rank candidates against employer-defined "Blueprint" criteria, and flag scripted or AI-generated answers.
§ The record
Humanly is filed under Screening AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Humanly | Willo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 24% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Humanly 40 · Willo 53
1.9 weighted points to Willo
18% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Humanly 40 · Willo 30
1.8 weighted points to Humanly
15% weight · 66% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Humanly 35 · Willo 25
1.5 weighted points to Humanly
20% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Humanly 45 · Willo 38
1.4 weighted points to Humanly
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Humanly 30 · Willo 36
0.7 weighted points to Willo
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Humanly 58 · Willo 62
0.5 weighted points to Willo
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Humanly 52 · Willo 54
0.2 weighted points to Willo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Humanly minus Willo.
| Category | Weight | Humanly | Willo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 38 | +7 | +1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 53 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 62 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 36 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 54 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 41 (F) | +1 | +1.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Humanly | Willo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Humanly last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Willo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next