§ The result
iMocha leads Pulsifi on all 7 criteria.
iMocha finishes 23 points clear of Pulsifi inside the Assessment cohort under rubric v1.0: 56 against 33. iMocha leads every one of the 7 criteria and 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Pulsifi leads none. The advantage iMocha holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (iMocha 68, Pulsifi 30, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 33% of the weighted points iMocha gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
iMocha
iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment and skills-intelligence platform that evaluates candidates and employees across technical, cognitive, coding, and soft skills for hiring and internal talent management, including AI-based coding simulators and an AI video interviewer (Tara).
Vendor profile
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
§ The record
iMocha and Pulsifi are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Video interview and Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | iMocha | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | SG |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
iMocha 68 · Pulsifi 30
7.6 weighted points to iMocha
18% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
iMocha 44 · Pulsifi 20
4.3 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
iMocha 66 · Pulsifi 40
3.9 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
iMocha 48 · Pulsifi 28
2.4 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
iMocha 38 · Pulsifi 25
1.9 weighted points to iMocha
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
iMocha 66 · Pulsifi 46
1.6 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
iMocha 64 · Pulsifi 55
1.1 weighted points to iMocha
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +22.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +23 beside that +22.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is iMocha minus Pulsifi.
| Category | Weight | iMocha | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 68 | 30 | +38 | +7.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 44 | 20 | +24 | +4.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 25 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 66 | 40 | +26 | +3.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 55 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 48 | 28 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 46 | +20 | +1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 33 (F) | +23 | +22.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | iMocha | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
iMocha has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for iMocha sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for iMocha, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- iMocha last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next