§ The result
Indeed leads Radancy on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Indeed finishes 9 points ahead of Radancy under rubric v1.0, 50 to 41, both scored as Sourcing entries. Indeed leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Radancy is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Indeed leads is Post-Market Monitoring, Indeed 40 to Radancy 36. The advantage Indeed holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Indeed 38, Radancy 20, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 34% of the weighted points Indeed gains across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Indeed
Job marketplace whose employer-side AI (the Talent Scout agent, Sourcing Assistant, Smart Screening and candidate matching) sources, ranks and scores candidates from Indeed's profile pool and applicant flow and drafts outreach to them.
Vendor profile
Radancy
Radancy is an enterprise talent acquisition cloud combining recruitment marketing, career sites and CRM with agentic AI that sources, screens, scores, ranks and schedules candidates, including one-way video screening inherited from its myInterview acquisition.
§ The record
Indeed and Radancy are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Radancy is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Indeed | Radancy |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2004 | 2006 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Indeed 38 · Radancy 20
3.2 weighted points to Indeed
20% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Indeed 58 · Radancy 42
3.2 weighted points to Indeed
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Indeed 38 · Radancy 28
1.5 weighted points to Indeed
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Indeed 63 · Radancy 57
0.7 weighted points to Indeed
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Indeed 40 · Radancy 36
0.5 weighted points to Indeed
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Indeed 64 · Radancy 60
0.3 weighted points to Indeed
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +9.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +9.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Indeed minus Radancy.
| Category | Weight | Indeed | Radancy | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 20 | +18 | +3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 28 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 58 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 63 | 57 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 36 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 60 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 50 (F) | 41 (F) | +9 | +9.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Indeed | Radancy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 2 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 36 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Indeed has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 36 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Radancy has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Indeed sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Indeed, across 5 distinct source domains, and 22 for Radancy, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Indeed last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Radancy last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next