HomeCompareIndeed vs Saville Assessment

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Indeed vs Saville Assessment

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

2 points separate Indeed and Saville Assessment.

Indeed holds a 2-point edge over Saville Assessment under rubric v1.0, 50 to 48, across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Indeed: Indeed is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Saville Assessment on Bias Audit Transparency. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Indeed 58, Saville Assessment 50 — and at a 20% weight it carries 45% of the weighted advantage Indeed holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Indeed is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Saville Assessment under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Saville Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordIndeedSaville Assessment
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20042004

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Indeed 58 · Saville Assessment 50

    1.6 weighted points to Indeed

  2. 12% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Indeed 63 · Saville Assessment 55

    1.0 weighted points to Indeed

  3. 18% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Indeed 38 · Saville Assessment 42

    0.7 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  4. 15% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Indeed 58 · Saville Assessment 55

    0.4 weighted points to Indeed

  5. 8% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Indeed 64 · Saville Assessment 60

    0.3 weighted points to Indeed

  6. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Indeed 38 · Saville Assessment 40

    0.3 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Indeed 40 · Saville Assessment 38

    0.2 weighted points to Indeed

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +2.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +2.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Indeed minus Saville Assessment.

CategoryWeightIndeedSaville AssessmentΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5850+8+1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3842-4-0.7
FRIA Support15%3840-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5855+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%6355+8+1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%4038+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%6460+4+0.3
Total100%50 (F)48 (F)+2+2.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightIndeedSaville Assessment
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Sources on the vendor's own domain51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%42Sources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%70Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%365Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain346Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Indeed has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 36 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Indeed and Saville Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 80 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Indeed, across 5 distinct source domains, and 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Indeed last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Saville Assessment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.