HomeCompareInfor Talent Science vs JobAdder

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Infor Talent Science vs JobAdder

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

4 points separate Infor Talent Science and JobAdder.

Infor Talent Science (Assessment) edges JobAdder (ATS-integrated) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 49 to 45. Infor Talent Science leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while JobAdder leads 1, including Human Oversight Design. The advantage Infor Talent Science holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Infor Talent Science 58, JobAdder 50, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 38% of the weighted points Infor Talent Science gains across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Infor Talent Science is filed under Assessment AI, JobAdder under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Infor Talent Science is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordInfor Talent ScienceJobAdder
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSAU
Founded20022007

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 34% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Infor Talent Science 58 · JobAdder 50

    1.6 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  2. 18% weight · 62% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Infor Talent Science 42 · JobAdder 35

    1.3 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  3. 15% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Infor Talent Science 35 · JobAdder 30

    0.8 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  4. 12% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Infor Talent Science 50 · JobAdder 54

    0.5 weighted points to JobAdder

  5. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Infor Talent Science 45 · JobAdder 43

    0.2 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  6. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Infor Talent Science 60 · JobAdder 58

    0.2 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Infor Talent Science 57 · JobAdder 56

    0.1 weighted points to Infor Talent Science

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +3.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Infor Talent Science minus JobAdder.

CategoryWeightInfor Talent ScienceJobAdderΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5850+8+1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%4235+7+1.3
FRIA Support15%3530+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5756+1+0.1
Human Oversight Design12%5054-4-0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%4543+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%49 (F)45 (F)+4+3.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightInfor Talent ScienceJobAdder
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%277Sources on the vendor's own domain245Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Infor Talent Science has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; JobAdder has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for JobAdder sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Infor Talent Science, across 1 distinct source domain, and 29 for JobAdder, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Infor Talent Science last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
JobAdder last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.