§ The result
Interviewer.AI leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Interviewer.AI (Video interview) opens an 18-point lead on JobDiva (ATS-integrated), 47 to 29. JobDiva leads none of the 7 criteria, and Interviewer.AI is ahead on 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them. The advantage Interviewer.AI holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Interviewer.AI 52, JobDiva 28, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 27% of the weighted points Interviewer.AI gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
Interviewer.AI is filed under Video interview AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Interviewer.AI is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Interviewer.AI | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | SG | US |
| Founded | 2018 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Interviewer.AI 52 · JobDiva 28
4.8 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
18% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Interviewer.AI 35 · JobDiva 15
3.6 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Interviewer.AI 60 · JobDiva 38
3.3 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Interviewer.AI 60 · JobDiva 40
2.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Interviewer.AI 35 · JobDiva 22
1.9 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Interviewer.AI 58 · JobDiva 42
1.3 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Interviewer.AI 32 · JobDiva 30
0.2 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +17.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +18 beside that +17.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Interviewer.AI minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | Interviewer.AI | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 28 | +24 | +4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 15 | +20 | +3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 38 | +22 | +3.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 40 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 30 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 47 (F) | 29 (F) | +18 | +17.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Interviewer.AI | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next