§ The result
Interviewer.AI leads Mercor on all 7 criteria.
Interviewer.AI finishes 24 points clear of Mercor under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 23 — across the Video interview and Screening cohorts. Interviewer.AI leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Mercor leads none. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Data Governance Disclosure (Interviewer.AI 60, Mercor 22) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Interviewer.AI 52, Mercor 22), the second being 26% of the weighted advantage Interviewer.AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
Vendor profile
Mercor
Mercor is an AI talent platform that runs automated 20-minute AI video interviews and semantic resume/profile matching to vet, score, and place candidates and expert contractors, and offers an enterprise applicant-screening product that scores employers' applicant pools against role rubrics with pass/fail recommendations.
§ The record
Interviewer.AI is filed under Video interview AI, Mercor under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Interviewer.AI | Mercor |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | SG | US |
| Founded | 2018 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 26% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Interviewer.AI 52 · Mercor 22
6.0 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
15% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Interviewer.AI 60 · Mercor 22
5.7 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
18% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Interviewer.AI 35 · Mercor 10
4.5 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Interviewer.AI 35 · Mercor 20
2.3 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Interviewer.AI 60 · Mercor 42
2.2 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Interviewer.AI 32 · Mercor 20
1.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Interviewer.AI 58 · Mercor 40
1.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +23.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 23.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +24 beside that +23.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Interviewer.AI minus Mercor.
| Category | Weight | Interviewer.AI | Mercor | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 22 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 10 | +25 | +4.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 20 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 22 | +38 | +5.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 20 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 40 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 47 (F) | 23 (F) | +24 | +23.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Interviewer.AI | Mercor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Mercor has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain, and 16 for Mercor, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Mercor last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next